That is as a result of the “other income” line of IRS Form 1040 asks whether or not a taxpayer has had debt forgiven within the final calendar 12 months. That debt can embrace bank card, medical, and different unsecured debt, or, as President Joe Biden has famous, different varieties of debt reminiscent of scholar mortgage debt. As far because the IRS is worried, debt that has been wiped off that household’s books is akin to a wage or hourly wages. If, for instance, a household owed $50,000 in medical debt, however on their very own or with a debt decision supplier, was capable of cut back that sum to $10,000, the IRS would contemplate the $40,000 distinction as earnings of their pockets.

In different phrases, so far as the federal authorities is worried, resolving debt is identical as getting a bonus or successful the lottery. Eliminating debt is liberating, however it’s definitely not the identical as successful the jackpot.

This provision is unconscionable at a time when bank card rates of interest have soared previous 22%, bank card delinquencies are rising, and 41% of Americans maintain medical or dental debt.

However, it would take congressional motion to alter the legislation. The American Association for Debt Resolution (AADR) believes Congress ought to consider altering the present legislation in order that households scuffling with debt are usually not hit with an unexpected tax as soon as they discover monetary freedom. That’s why we’ve requested that Congress’s Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) tally precisely how a lot aid would come from eliminating this reporting requirement.

Other organizations have performed their very own calculations that reveal the numerous burden that this single line of the 1040 type locations on struggling debtors. According to The Urban Institute, canceling $10,000 in debt would value a taxpayer incomes lower than $122,000 about $2,400. Forgiving $50,000 in debt would value a taxpayer $6,160.

For households dealing with a monetary disaster, these numbers are important. In reality, these sums are so massive that, if the tax code is just not modified, it could even discourage some people and households from contemplating debt decision as an possibility and power them to think about chapter with all of its long-term ache as a substitute.

American households deserve higher. In many circumstances, they’re struggling at no fault of their very own— they’ve been laid off, have a sick baby, or have gone via a divorce or different household emergency. The typical debt decision shopper owes greater than $25,000 in unsecured debt and is already behind on a minimum of one or, in lots of circumstances, even seven or extra accounts. According to a current report, shoppers see their general debt diminished by almost 32% on settled accounts. Eliminating this debt frees households, and it helps the collectors which are owed.

Turning American households’ forgiven debt into taxable earnings is just unfair. And Americans are fearful in regards to the equity of the federal tax code. According to a current Associated Press survey, 60% of Americans suppose the federal tax system is unfair. That quantity contains 65% of Republicans and half of Democrats.

Changing the tax code to remove the supply that treats forgiven debt as earnings is a straightforward approach to make the federal system extra honest.

The Joint Committee on Taxation should work rapidly to finish its evaluation of this situation, and when that report is finished, lawmakers should change the IRS guidelines relating to discharged debt. Families who diligently work with collectors to remove bank card, medical, and different unsecured debt mustn’t find yourself owing extra to the IRS.

Denise Dunckel Morse is CEO of the American Association for Debt Resolution, a nonprofit advocacy group that educates shoppers and policymakers about debt decision and holds debt decision firms to the very best requirements.

More must-read commentary revealed by Fortune:

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary items are solely the views of their authors and don’t essentially replicate the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.